Have a small business here and there are some ip cameras connected to the server at vlan 2
the overall setup consists of
vlan1
vlan 2
vlan 3
vlan 4
vlan 20
vlan 20 is a more public vlan, and therefor i thought i would put a camera to that vlan as well as vlan 2
I used: vlan 20 ip 10.199.39.49
Seeing now in the show configuration snapshot i have vlan 20 ip 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 so now my camera server has lost connection to all the cameras... i dont know why this happened, but i would like to remove the reference to vlan 20 again?
So question is.. did my initial command add the vlan 20 IP 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 to the configuration snapshot?
And what command to remove 10.199.39.49 from vlan 20 but keep to vlan 2?
Please respond, i'm desperate to get the cameras back online!
Trouble in paradise
-
kakemanx
Re: Trouble in paradise
Thanks, but figured it out.. Vlan 20 no IP xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Had the no in the wrong place..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Had the no in the wrong place..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Trouble in paradise
It seem that you have forgott the mask as you have configured the ip interface for vlan 20. With an ip 10.x.x.x the switch assumed standard mask 255.0.0.0.
verify it with:
> show ip interface
there you will see your ip interface with a name XXXX (given by you).
than you can change the mask with command:
> ip interface XXXX mask 255.255.255.0
or complete:
> ip interface XXXX address 10.199.39.49/24 vlan 20
regards
Silvio
verify it with:
> show ip interface
there you will see your ip interface with a name XXXX (given by you).
than you can change the mask with command:
> ip interface XXXX mask 255.255.255.0
or complete:
> ip interface XXXX address 10.199.39.49/24 vlan 20
regards
Silvio
-
rekeds
Re: Trouble in paradise
why "show ip interfaces"? if he created a vlan rule?
wasn't it ip interface name-here ip/mask vlan zvlan 20 ip 10.199.39.49
Re: Trouble in paradise
Hi Rekeds
you are correct - I didn't see it as a vlan rule. I have understand it as a list with vlan, ip-address....
So the use of vlan rule instead of correct ip-interfaces can be the reason. this vlan rules didn't make any sense.
regards
Silvio
you are correct - I didn't see it as a vlan rule. I have understand it as a list with vlan, ip-address....
So the use of vlan rule instead of correct ip-interfaces can be the reason. this vlan rules didn't make any sense.
regards
Silvio
-
devnull
Re: Trouble in paradise
I do not even understand the
"vlan 20 is a more public vlan, and therefor i thought i would put a camera to that vlan as well as vlan 2
I used: vlan 20 ip 10.199.39.49"
a Camera in both vlans? how should that work?
If the switch is the routing-instance the "more public vlan" does not make sense.. use a firewall to sperate the traffic.
Give the camera an ip out of vlan 20, with a gateway pointing to the routing instances.
IP rules are probably not the solution that you need
"vlan 20 is a more public vlan, and therefor i thought i would put a camera to that vlan as well as vlan 2
I used: vlan 20 ip 10.199.39.49"
a Camera in both vlans? how should that work?
If the switch is the routing-instance the "more public vlan" does not make sense.. use a firewall to sperate the traffic.
Give the camera an ip out of vlan 20, with a gateway pointing to the routing instances.
IP rules are probably not the solution that you need
