native vlan
Posted: 21 Dec 2017 12:31
HI
what are the contraindications to use different native vlan ids on the 802.1q trunk ports ?
For example I set the vlan untagged on the 10K port, and left the default (1) vlan on all the ports of the remote switch (6250):
10K:
show vlan members port 1/1
vlan type status
--------+-----------+---------------
10 default forwarding
25 qtagged forwarding
60 qtagged forwarding
show ip interface:
vlan10 172.16.10.254 255.255.255.0 UP YES vlan 10
Remote (6250)
show vlan port 1/1
vlan type status
--------+---------+--------------
1 default forwarding
25 qtagged forwarding
60 qtagged forwarding
show vlan 1 port
port type status
---------+---------+--------------
1/1 default forwarding
1/2 default inactive
1/3 default forwarding
1/4 default forwarding
1/5 default forwarding
......
the vlan 10 works in every ports of the 6250 (and also the other vlans, where the device use tagging).
What are the pros and cons of using this kind of configuration instead of just use the tag on the trunk ports and the default vlan in all remote switch ports ?
PS: the same config worked also in 7800 and 9800 (my precedent central l3 switches)
thanks
Giacomo
what are the contraindications to use different native vlan ids on the 802.1q trunk ports ?
For example I set the vlan untagged on the 10K port, and left the default (1) vlan on all the ports of the remote switch (6250):
10K:
show vlan members port 1/1
vlan type status
--------+-----------+---------------
10 default forwarding
25 qtagged forwarding
60 qtagged forwarding
show ip interface:
vlan10 172.16.10.254 255.255.255.0 UP YES vlan 10
Remote (6250)
show vlan port 1/1
vlan type status
--------+---------+--------------
1 default forwarding
25 qtagged forwarding
60 qtagged forwarding
show vlan 1 port
port type status
---------+---------+--------------
1/1 default forwarding
1/2 default inactive
1/3 default forwarding
1/4 default forwarding
1/5 default forwarding
......
the vlan 10 works in every ports of the 6250 (and also the other vlans, where the device use tagging).
What are the pros and cons of using this kind of configuration instead of just use the tag on the trunk ports and the default vlan in all remote switch ports ?
PS: the same config worked also in 7800 and 9800 (my precedent central l3 switches)
thanks
Giacomo