call from 4645 auto att not o/flow to 2nd route in entity

knightr1der · Post by **knightr1der** » 02 Aug 2009 19:35

It's the "should" in your last post that worries me. This customer is being very precious right now and my next move must be one that is 100% guarenteed!

Post by **tot3nkopf** » 03 Aug 2009 15:14

knightr1der wrote:It's the "should" in your last post that worries me. This customer is being very precious right now and my next move must be one that is 100% guarenteed!

When walking on thin ice knigh,t wouldn't be wise to replicate the issue on lab and test possible solutions?

murraya · Post by **murraya** » 03 Aug 2009 17:18

I would just charge ahead and see if I got wet. Whats the worst that could happen? It fails like all other options.

knightr1der · Post by **knightr1der** » 18 Aug 2009 16:59

tot3nkopf wrote:When walking on thin ice knigh,t wouldn't be wise to replicate the issue on lab and test possible solutions?

tot3 - having a lab would be like a dream come true!

Post by **tot3nkopf** » 20 Aug 2009 15:34

I have one at my office, but in 9 out of 10 times I use VmWare on my laptop.

Alcatel Unleashed

call from 4645 auto att not o/flow to 2nd route in entity

Re: call from 4645 auto att not o/flow to 2nd route in entity

Re: call from 4645 auto att not o/flow to 2nd route in entity

Re: call from 4645 auto att not o/flow to 2nd route in entity

Re: call from 4645 auto att not o/flow to 2nd route in entity

Re: call from 4645 auto att not o/flow to 2nd route in entity